4.8 Article

Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial

期刊

LANCET
卷 381, 期 9864, 页码 385-393

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61351-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation Nutrition 2000Plus
  2. ICU Quality Funds
  3. Baxter
  4. Fresenius Kabi
  5. Laboratoire Aguettant
  6. B Braun
  7. Nestle Medical Nutrition
  8. Novartis
  9. Novo Nordisk France
  10. Nutricia
  11. Abbott
  12. Cosmed
  13. Nutricia-Numico
  14. Pfizer
  15. Solvay
  16. APSI-ICU quality funds of the Geneva University Hospital
  17. Internal Service Resources of the Lausanne University Hospital
  18. academic Societe Nationale Francaise de Gastroenterologie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Enteral nutrition (EN) is recommended for patients in the intensive-care unit (ICU), but it does not consistently achieve nutritional goals. We assessed whether delivery of 100% of the energy target from days 4 to 8 in the ICU with EN plus supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) could optimise clinical outcome. Methods This randomised controlled trial was undertaken in two centres in Switzerland. We enrolled patients on day 3 of admission to the ICU who had received less than 60% of their energy target from EN, were expected to stay for longer than 5 days, and to survive for longer than 7 days. We calculated energy targets with indirect calorimetry on day 3, or if not possible, set targets as 25 and 30 kcal per kg of ideal bodyweight a day for women and men, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned (1: 1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive EN or SPN. The primary outcome was occurrence of nosocomial infection after cessation of intervention (day 8), measured until end of follow-up (day 28), analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00802503. Findings We randomly assigned 153 patients to SPN and 152 to EN. 30 patients discontinued before the study end. Mean energy delivery between day 4 and 8 was 28 kcal/kg per day (SD 5) for the SPN group (103% [SD 18%] of energy target), compared with 20 kcal/kg per day (7) for the EN group (77% [27%]). Between days 9 and 28, 41 (27%) of 153 patients in the SPN group had a nosocomial infection compared with 58 (38%) of 152 patients in the EN group (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.97; p=0.0338), and the SPN group had a lower mean number of nosocomial infections per patient (-0.42 [-0.79 to -0.05]; p=0.0248). Interpretation Individually optimised energy supplementation with SPN starting 4 days after ICU admission could reduce nosocomial infections and should be considered as a strategy to improve clinical outcome in patients in the ICU for whom EN is insufficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据