4.8 Article

Future treatment strategies in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

期刊

LANCET
卷 382, 期 9892, 页码 644-657

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61452-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [SNF 33CM30_140336/1, SNF 32003B_146442/1]
  2. Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  3. King's College London
  4. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  5. British Heart Foundation [FS/11/70/28917]
  6. British Heart Foundation [FS/11/70/28917] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past five decades, management of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has evolved substantially. Current treatment encompasses a systematic chain of network activation, antithrombotic drugs, and rapid instigation of mechanical reperfusion, although pharmacoinvasive strategies remain relevant. Secondary prevention with drugs and lifestyle modifications completes the contemporary management package. Despite a tangible improvement in outcomes, STEMI remains a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality, justifying the quest to find new therapeutic avenues. Ways to reduce delays in doing coronary angioplasty after STEMI onset include early recognition of symptoms by patients and prehospital diagnosis by paramedics so that the emergency room can be bypassed in favour of direct admission to the catheterisation laboratory. Mechanical reperfusion can be optimised by improvements to stent design, whereas visualisation of infarct size has been improved by developments in cardiac MRI. Novel treatments to modulate the inflammatory component of atherosclerosis and the vulnerable plaque include use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and anti-proliferative drugs. Translational efforts to improve patients' outcomes after STEMI in relation to cardioprotection, cardiac remodelling, and regeneration are also being realised.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据