4.8 Article

Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study

期刊

LANCET
卷 381, 期 9861, 页码 117-124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61267-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amylin Pharmaceuticals LLC
  2. Andromeda
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Bayhill Therapeutics
  5. Biodel
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  8. Catabasis
  9. Cebix
  10. Diartis
  11. Elcelyx
  12. Eli Lilly and Company
  13. Exsulin
  14. GI Dynamics
  15. Halozyme
  16. Hoffman-LaRoche
  17. Johnson Johnson
  18. Lexicon
  19. LipoScience
  20. Medtronic MiniMed
  21. Merck
  22. Metabolon
  23. Novan
  24. Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals
  25. Osiris Therapeutics
  26. Orexigen
  27. Pfizer
  28. Sanofi
  29. Tolerx
  30. Transition Therapeutics
  31. TransPharma
  32. Verva Pharmaceuticals
  33. Berlin-Chemie AG (Menarini Group)
  34. Sharp Dohme
  35. Novartis Pharma AG
  36. GlaxoSmithKline
  37. MetaCure
  38. Roche Pharma AG
  39. Novo Nordisk Pharma GmbH
  40. Bristol-Myers Squibb EMEA
  41. Diartis Pharmaceuticals
  42. F Hoffmann-LaRoche
  43. Intarcia Therapeutics
  44. MannKind Corp
  45. Merck Sharp Dohme GmbH
  46. NovoNordisk A/S
  47. Sanofi-Aventis Pharma
  48. Takeda
  49. Versartis
  50. Wyeth Research
  51. Novo Nordisk
  52. Bayer
  53. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists exenatide and liraglutide have been shown to improve glycaemic control and reduce bodyweight in patients with type 2 diabetes. We compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly with liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods We did a 26 week, open-label, randomised, parallel-group study at 105 sites in 19 countries between Jan 11, 2010, and Jan 17, 2011. Patients aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes treated with lifestyle modification and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated randomisation sequence with a voice response system, to receive injections of once-daily liraglutide (1.8 mg) or once-weekly exenatide (2 mg). Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to week 26. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01029886. Findings Of 912 randomised patients, 911 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (450 liraglutide, 461 exenatide). The least-squares mean change in HbA(1c) was greater in patients in the liraglutide group (-1.48%, SE 0.05; n=386) than in those in the exenatide group (-1.28%, 0.05; 390) with the treatment difference (0.21%, 95% CI 0.08-0.33) not meeting predefined non-inferiority criteria (upper limit of CI <0.25%). The most common adverse events were nausea (93 [21%] in the liraglutide group vs 43 [9%] in the exenatide group), diarrhoea (59 [13%] vs 28 [6%]), and vomiting 48 [11%] vs 17 [4%]), which occurred less frequently in the exenatide group and with decreasing incidence over time in both groups. 24 (5%) patients allocated to liraglutide and 12 (3%) allocated to exenatide discontinued participation because of adverse events. Interpretation Both once daily liraglutide and once weekly exenatide led to improvements in glycaemic control, with greater reductions noted with liraglutide. These findings, plus differences in injection frequency and tolerability, could inform therapeutic decisions for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据