4.8 Article

Effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome (FITNET): a randomised controlled trial

期刊

LANCET
卷 379, 期 9824, 页码 1412-1418

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60025-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [ZonMW 60-60800-98-013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Chronic fatigue syndrome is characterised by persistent fatigue and severe disability. Cognitive behavioural therapy seems to be a promising treatment, but its availability is restricted. We developed Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET (FITNET), the first dedicated internet-based therapeutic program for adolescents with this disorder, and compared its effectiveness with that of usual care. Methods Adolescents aged 12-18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome were assigned to FITNET or usual care in a 1: 1 ratio at one tertiary treatment centre in the Netherlands by use of a computer-generated blocked randomisation allocation schedule. The study was open label. Primary outcomes were school attendance, fatigue severity, and physical functioning, and were assessed at 6 months with computerised questionnaires. Analysis was by intention to treat. Thereafter, all patients were offered FITNET if needed. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN59878666. Findings 68 of 135 adolescents were assigned to FITNET and 67 to usual care, and 67 and 64, respectively, were analysed. FITNET was significantly more effective than was usual care for all dichotomised primary outcomes at 6 months-full school attendance (50 [75%] vs 10 [16%], relative risk 4.8, 95% CI 2.7-8.9; p<0.0001), absence of severe fatigue (57 [85%] vs 17 [27%], 3.2, 2.1-4.9; p<0.0001), and normal physical functioning (52 [78%] vs 13 [20%], 3.8, 2.3-6.3; p<0.0001). No serious adverse events were reported. Interpretation FITNET offers a readily accessible and highly effective treatment for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome. The results of this study justify implementation on a broader scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据