4.8 Article

Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks

期刊

LANCET
卷 379, 期 9835, 页码 2439-2448

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60917-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Gilead Sciences
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Merck Laboratories
  5. Tibotec
  6. Abbott Laboratories
  7. Aeliron Scientific
  8. Janssen Therapeutics
  9. Achillion Pharmaceuticals
  10. Avexa
  11. Boehringer Ingelheim
  12. Hoffmann LaRoche
  13. Idenix
  14. Janssen
  15. Merck
  16. Pfizer
  17. Sangamo
  18. Taimed
  19. Tobira
  20. Vertex
  21. Kowa
  22. ViiV
  23. Merck Co

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The integrase inhibitor elvitegravir (EVG) has been co-formulated with the CYP3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (COBI), emtricitabine (FTC), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in a single tablet given once daily. We compared the efficacy and safety of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF with standard of care-co-formulated efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF-as initial treatment for HIV infection. Methods In this phase 3 trial, treatment-naive patients from outpatient clinics in North America were randomly assigned by computer-generated allocation sequence with a block size of four in a 1: 1 ratio to receive EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF, once daily, plus matching placebo. Patients and study staff involved in giving study treatment, assessing outcomes, and collecting and analysing data were masked to treatment allocation. Eligibility criteria included screening HIV RNA concentration of 5000 copies per mL or more, and susceptibility to efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. The primary endpoint was HIV RNA concentration of fewer than 50 copies per mL at week 48. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01095796. Findings 700 patients were randomly assigned and treated (348 with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, 352 with EFV/FTC/TDF). EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was non-inferior to EFV/FTC/TDF; 305/348 (87.6%) versus 296/352 (84.1%) of patients had HIV RNA concentrations of fewer than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (difference 3.6%, 95% CI -1.6% to 8.8%). Proportions of patients discontinuing drugs for adverse events did not differ substantially (13/348 in the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group vs 18/352 in the EFV/FTC/TDF group). Nausea was more common with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF than with EFV/FTC/TDF (72/348 vs 48/352) and dizziness (23/348 vs 86/352), abnormal dreams (53/348 vs 95/352), insomnia (30/348 vs 49/352), and rash (22/348 vs 43/352) were less common. Serum creatinine concentration increased more by week 48 in the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group than in the EFV/FTC/TDF group (median 13 mu mol/L, IQR 5 to 20 vs 1 mu mol/L, -6 to 8; p < 0.001). Interpretation If regulatory approval is given, EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF would be the only single-tablet, once-daily, integrase-inhibitor-based regimen for initial treatment of HIV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据