4.3 Article

High-nitrate vegetable diet increases plasma nitrate and nitrite concentrations and reduces blood pressure in healthy women

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 14, 页码 2669-2678

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015000038

关键词

Nitrate; Nitrite; Vegetables; Blood pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Epidemiological studies suggest that green leafy vegetables, which are high in dietary nitrate, are protective against CVD such as stroke. High blood pressure (BP) is a major risk factor for stroke and inorganic nitrate has been shown to reduce BP. The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that diets containing high-nitrate (HN) vegetables would increase plasma nitrate and nitrite concentrations and reduce BP in healthy women. Design: A randomized, crossover trial, where participants received HN vegetables (HN diet) or avoided HN vegetables (Control diet) for 1 week. Before and after each intervention, resting BP and plasma nitrate and nitrite concentrations were measured. Setting: University of Exeter, UK. Subjects: Nineteen healthy women (mean age 20 (sd 2) years; mean BMI 22.5 (sd 3.8) kg/m(2)). Results: The HN diet significantly increased plasma nitrate concentration (before HN diet: mean 24.4 (sd 5.6) mu mol/l; after HN diet: mean 61.0 (sd 44.1) mu mol/l, P<0.05) and plasma nitrite concentration (before HN diet: mean 98 (sd 91) nmol/l; after HN diet: mean 185 (sd 34) nmol/l, P<0.05). No significant change in plasma nitrate or nitrite concentration was observed after the Control diet. The HN diet significantly reduced resting systolic BP (before HN diet: mean 107 (sd 9) mmHg; after HN diet: mean 103 (sd 6) mmHg, P<0.05). No significant change in systolic BP was observed after the Control diet (before Control diet: mean 106 (sd 8) mmHg; after Control diet: mean 106 (sd 8) mmHg). Conclusions: Consumption of HN vegetables significantly increased plasma nitrate and nitrite concentrations and reduced BP in normotensive women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据