4.8 Article

Safety and efficacy of dalcetrapib on atherosclerotic disease using novel non-invasive multimodality imaging (dal-PLAQUE): a randomised clinical trial

期刊

LANCET
卷 378, 期 9802, 页码 1547-1559

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61383-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
  2. Roche
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Merck
  5. VBL Therapeutics
  6. Novartis
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  8. Via Pharmaceuticals
  9. Abbott
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. diaDexus
  12. Kowa
  13. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  14. Takeda
  15. National Institutes of Health
  16. American Diabetes Association
  17. American Heart Association
  18. Amarin
  19. F Hoffmann-La Roche Inc
  20. Sanofi-Aventis
  21. Schering-Plough
  22. National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  23. BMS
  24. Genentech
  25. VBL
  26. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-SGCL1-Rudd] Funding Source: researchfish
  27. British Heart Foundation [PG/09/083/27667] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Dalcetrapib modulates cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity to raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). After the failure of torcetrapib it was unknown if HDL produced by interaction with CETP had pro-atherogenic or pro-inflammatory properties. dal-PLAQUE is the first multicentre study using novel non-invasive multimodality imaging to assess structural and inflammatory indices of atherosclerosis as primary endpoints. Methods In this phase 2b, double-blind, multicentre trial, patients (aged 18-75 years) with, or with high risk of, coronary heart disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to dalcetrapib 600 mg/day or placebo for 24 months. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation code and was stratified by centre. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. Coprimary endpoints were MRI-assessed indices (total vessel area, wall area, wall thickness, and normalised wall index [average carotid]) after 24 months and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) PET/CT assessment of arterial inflammation within an index vessel (right carotid, left carotid, or ascending thoracic aorta) after 6 months, with no-harm boundaries established before unblinding of the trial. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00655473. Findings 189 patients were screened and 130 randomly assigned to placebo (66 patients) or dalcetrapib (64 patients). For the coprimary MRI and PET/CT endpoints, CIs were below the no-harm boundary or the adverse change was numerically lower in the dalcetrapib group than in the placebo group. MRI-derived change in total vessel area was reduced in patients given dalcetrapib compared with those given placebo after 24 months; absolute change from baseline relative to placebo was -4.01 mm(2) (90% CI -7.23 to -0.80; nominal p=0.04). The PET/CT measure of index vessel most-diseased-segment target-to-background ratio (TBR) was not different between groups, but carotid artery analysis showed a 7% reduction in most-diseased-segment TBR in the dalcetrapib group compared with the placebo group (-7.3 [90% CI -13.5 to -0.8]; nominal p=0.07). Dalcetrapib did not increase office blood pressure and the frequency of adverse events was similar between groups. Interpretation Dalcetrapib showed no evidence of a pathological effect related to the arterial wall over 24 months. Moreover, this trial suggests possible beneficial vascular effects of dalcetrapib, including the reduction in total vessel enlargement over 24 months, but long-term safety and clinical outcomes efficacy of dalcetrapib need to be analysed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据