4.8 Article

Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

期刊

LANCET
卷 377, 期 9784, 页码 2193-2204

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60764-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Boston Scientific and The Medicines Company
  2. TherOx
  3. Medicines Company
  4. Abbott Vascular
  5. Atrium
  6. Boston Scientific
  7. Wean
  8. Infra ReDx
  9. Medtronic
  10. LightLab Imaging
  11. Accumetrics
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  13. Sanofi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Primary results of the HORIZONS-AMI trial have been previously reported. In this final report, we aimed to assess 3-year outcomes. Methods HORIZONS-AMI was a prospective, open-label, randomised trial undertaken at 123 institutions in 11 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for enrolment if they had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEM!), presented within 12 h after onset of symptoms, and were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. By use of a computerised interactive voice response system, we randomly allocated patients 1:1 to receive bivalirudin or heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI; pharmacological randomisation; stratified by previous and expected drug use and study site) and, if eligible, randomly allocated 3:1 to receive a paclitaxel-eluting stent or a bare metal stent (stent randomisation; stratified by pharmacological group assignment, diabetes mellitus status, lesion length, and study site). We produced Kaplan-Meier estimates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433966. Findings Compared with 1802 patients allocated to receive heparin plus a GPI, 1800 patients allocated to bivalirudin monotherapy had lower rates of all-cause mortality (5.9% vs 7.7%, difference -1.9% [-3.5 to 0.2], HR 0.75 [0.58-0.97]; p=0.03), cardiac mortality (2.9% vs 5.1%, -2.2% [-3.5 to -0.9], 0.56 [0.40-0.80]; p=0.001), reinfarction (6.2% vs 8.2%, 1.9% [-3.7 to -0.2], 0.76 [0.59-0.99]; p=0.04), and major bleeding not related to bypass graft surgery (6.9% vs 10.5%, -3.6% [-5.5 to -1.7], 0.64 [0.51-0.80]; p=0.0001) at 3 years, with no significant differences in ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation, stent thrombosis, or composite adverse events. Compared with 749 patients who received a bare-metal stent, 2257 patients who received a paclitaxel-eluting stent had lower rates of ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (9.4% vs 15.1%, -5.7% [-8.6 to -2.7], 0.60 [0.48-0.76]; p<0.0001) after 3 years, with no significant differences in the rates of death, reinfarction, stroke or stent thrombosis. Stent thrombosis was high (>= 4.5%) in both groups. Interpretation The effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stenting are sustained at 3 years for patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据