4.3 Article

Secular changes in intakes of foods among New Zealand adults from 1997 to 2008/09

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 18, 页码 3249-3259

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015000890

关键词

Food consumption; New Zealand; Trends; Food intake; National nutrition survey; 2008/09 NZANS; NNS97

资金

  1. NZ Ministry of Health
  2. University of Otago

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine changes in the food choices of New Zealand (NZ) adults, between the 1997 National Nutrition Survey (NNS97) and the 2008/09 NZ Adult Nutrition Survey (2008/09 NZANS). Design: The 2008/09 NZANS and the NNS97 were cross-sectional surveys of NZ adults (aged 15 years and over). Dietary intake data were collected using a computer-based 24 h diet recall. Logistic regression models were used to examine changes over time in the percentage reporting each food group, with survey year, sex and age group (19-30 years, 31-50 years, 51-70 years, 71 years) as the variables. Setting: NZ households. Subjects: Adults aged 19 years and over (NNS97, n 4339; 2008/09 NZANS, n 3995). Results: In the 2008/09 NZANS compared with NNS97, males and females were less likely to report consuming bread, potatoes, beef, vegetables, breakfast cereal, milk, cheese, butter, pies, biscuits, cakes and puddings, and sugar/confectionery (all P<0.001). In contrast, there was an increase in the percentage reporting rice and rice dishes (P<0.001), and among females a reported increase in snacks and snack bars (e.g. crisps, extruded snacks, muesli bars; P=0.007) and pasta and pasta dishes (P=0.017). Although food choices were associated with sex and age group, there were few differential changes between the surveys by sex or age group. Conclusions: For all age groups there was a shift in the percentage who reported consuming the traditional NZ foods, namely bread, beef, potatoes and vegetables, towards more rice and rice dishes. Declines in the consumption of butter, pies, biscuits, cakes and puddings are congruent with current dietary guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据