4.8 Article

Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 2 Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation

期刊

LANCET
卷 374, 期 9695, 页码 1097-1104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ethicon UK
  2. National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme
  3. Nuffield Department of Surgery at the University of oxford
  4. Department of Surgery at McGill University
  5. Medical Research Council UK
  6. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates
  7. Societe Francaise de Rhumatologie and Lavoisier Program (Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres et Europeennes)
  8. MRC [G0601938, G0800808] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Chief Scientist Office [HSRU1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [G0800808, G0601938] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures-for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据