4.1 Article

Assessing internal phosphorus load - Problems to be solved

期刊

LAKE AND RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 419-432

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00357520903458848

关键词

internal phosphorus load; retention; stratified and polymictic lakes and reservoirs; TP mass balance modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nurnberg, G. K. 2009. Assessing internal phosphorus load - Problems to be solved. Lake Reserv. Manage. 25:419-432. Internal loading as phosphorus (P) released from anoxic sediment surfaces often represents the main summer P load to lakes and reservoirs and can have an immense effect on their water quality. Many difficulties in internal load assessment exist, however, including ignoring internal load altogether, ambiguity about the origin of sediment released P and inexact definitions. Most of these problems are due to the difficulty in distinguishing internal from external P sources, which is particularly challenging in polymictic lakes. To prevent misconceptions and facilitate its evaluation, internal load in stratified and polymictic lakes should be expressed in a similar way to external loads: as annual, gross and areal load of total phosphorus (TP). Possible approaches to internal load quantification are: in situ determination from hypolimnetic P increases, mass balance approaches, and estimates from anoxic active area and P release. Further suggestions to facilitate the study of internal loading include: (a) the differentiation between polymictic and stratified lakes, sections of lakes, and time periods when evaluating indicators and impact of internal load; (b) the separation of internal load (upward flux) from sedimentation (downward flux) of external and internal loads, and (c) the consideration of the downward flux of both external (L-ext, mg/m(2)/yr) and internal (L-int, mg/m(2)/yr) loads by a retention model (R-sed) when predicting lake TP averages in a mass balance model of the form (q(s) = annual areal water load in m/yr): TP = L-ext + L-int/q(s) x (1 - R-sed)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据