4.6 Article

A tissue quality index: an intrinsic control for measurement of effects of preanalytical variables on FFPE tissue

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 467-474

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.7

关键词

epitope degradation; immunofluorescence; immunohistochemistry; preanalytic variables

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]
  2. Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata [RF-2010-2310674]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While efforts are made to improve tissue quality and control preanalytical variables, pathologists are often confronted with the challenge of molecular analysis of patient samples of unknown quality. Here we describe a first attempt to construct a tissue quality index (TQI) or an intrinsic control that would allow a global assessment of protein status based on quantitative measurement of a small number of selected, informative epitopes. Quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) of a number of proteins was performed on a series of 93 breast cancer cases where levels of expression were assessed as a function of delayed time to formalin fixation. A TQI was constructed based on the combination of proteins that most accurately reflect increased and decreased levels of expression in proportion to delay time. The TQI, defined by combinations of measurements of cytokeratin, ERK1/2 and pHSP-27 and their relationship to cold ischemic time were validated on a second build of the training series and on two independent breast tissue cohorts with recorded time to formalin fixation. We show an association of negative TQI values (an indicator for loss of tissue quality) with increasing cold ischemic time on both validation cohorts and an association with loss of ER expression levels on all three breast cohorts. Using expression levels of three epitopes, we can begin to assess the likelihood of delayed time to fixation or decreased tissue quality. This TQI represents a proof of concept for the use of epitope expression to provide a mechanism for monitoring tissue quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据