4.6 Article

Insulin promotes macrophage foam cell formation: potential implications in diabetes-related atherosclerosis

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 92, 期 8, 页码 1171-1180

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.74

关键词

ABCA1; atherosclerosis; CD36; foam cell; insulin; macrophage

资金

  1. NIH [P01 HL087018]
  2. KL2 award from the Case Western Reserve University Clinical Translational Research Award [UL1RR024989]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is higher in patients with type 2 diabetes, a disorder characterized by hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. The role of hyperinsulinemia as an independent participant in the atherogenic process has been controversial. In the current study, we tested the effect of insulin and the insulin sensitizer, adiponectin, on human macrophage foam cell formation. We found that both insulin and adiponectin increased the expression of the type 2 scavenger receptor CD36 by approximately twofold and decreased the expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCA1 by >480%. In both cases regulation was post-transcriptional. As a consequence of these changes, we found that oxidized LDL (oxLDL) uptake was increased by 80% and cholesterol efflux to apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) was decreased by similar to 25%. This led to two- to threefold more cholesterol accumulation over a 16-h period. As reported previously in studies of murine systems, scavenger receptor-A (SR-A) expression on human macrophages was downregulated by insulin and adiponectin. Insulin and adiponectin did not affect oxLDL-induced secretion of monocyte attractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). These studies suggest that hyperinsulinemia could promote macrophage foam cell formation and thus may contribute to atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Laboratory Investigation (2012) 92, 1171-1180; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2012.74; published online 23 April 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据