4.6 Article

Establishment of a standard 14-3-3 protein assay of cerebrospinal fluid as a diagnostic tool for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 90, 期 11, 页码 1637-1644

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.68

关键词

14-3-3 protein; CJD; CSF; prion disease; western blot; ELISA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Periodic sharp wave complexes observed on an electroencephalographic recording and the presence of a 14-3-3 protein in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are both included in the diagnostic criteria for the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) supplied by the World Health Organization; however, the presence or absence of the 14-3-3 protein in the CSF is sometimes difficult to discern on a western blot because of equivocal bands. The goal of this study was to establish a standard 14-3-3 protein assay and to determine the threshold level of a 14-3-3 protein that can be assayed by western blot. We searched for the most suitable isoform of the 14-3-3 protein to test for in protein assays, and the most sensitive antibody among four antibodies with an affinity for 14-3-3. We measured the levels of all 14-3-3 isoforms in 112 patients with CJD and in 100 patients with other diseases. We compared the performances of four different antibodies. We carried out a semi-quantitative analysis of gamma-isoform levels using the LAS 3000 system, which was capable of producing a digital image from the luminescence on a western blot. We determined that the most suitable isoform of the 14-3-3 protein for conducting a standardized assay was the gamma-isoform. Among the four commercially available antibodies for this protein, the most sensitive and specific was 18647 (IBL, Japan). We report the high repeatability of the detection of the 14-3-3 protein by this antibody to the gamma-isoform, showing that western blot can be used for semi-quantitative analysis. Laboratory Investigation (2010) 90, 1637-1644; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2009.68; published online 9 August 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据