4.6 Article

Rapid quantification of DNA methylation by measuring relative peak heights in direct bisulfite-PCR sequencing traces

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 282-290

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.132

关键词

DNA methylation; bisulfite sequencing; PCR; CpG sites; pyrosequencing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [30800622]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Research Program [09JC1402200]
  3. Shanghai leading Scientist for Public Health [08GWD07]
  4. Shanghai Key Subject Project for Public Health [08GWZX0301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various technologies are currently available to quantify DNA methylation. However, rapid and simple methods for determining the DNA methylation status of CpG sites in genes still remain elusive. In this report, we describe a novel method for the rapid quantification of CpG methylation on the basis of direct bisulfite-PCR sequencing method. According to the principles of bisulfite-PCR, converting unmethylated cytosines to thymine while leaving methylated cytosines unchanged, we regard the CpG site as a SNP and estimate the methylation status of cytosines in the given CG dinucleotides by measuring the ratio of the cytosine peak height to the sum of cytosine and thymine peak heights in automated DNA sequencing traces. Furthermore, we take several effective measures to break through the 'bottleneck' problems that render the routine bisulfite sequencing method unsuitable for quantitative methylation. In comparison with pyrosequencing and bisulfite-cloning sequencing, our method is confirmed to be a simple, high-throughput and cost-effective technology for determining the methylation status of specific genes. Accordingly, this novel method is anticipated to be an efficient and economical alternative tool for rapid quantification of methylation patterns in screening large numbers of clinical samples across multiple genes. Laboratory Investigation (2010) 90, 282-290; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2009.132; published online 14 December 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据