4.7 Article

A label-free DC impedance-based microcytometer for circulating rare cancer cell counting

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 970-977

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2lc41376k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nano/Bio Science & Technology Program of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [M10536090001-05N3609-00110]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  3. MEST [2012011289, 2005-2001287, 2011-0030266]
  4. Nano Material Technology Development Program through the NRF
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2005-2001249, 2005-2001287, 2012R1A2A1A03011289, 2011-0030268] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood samples is believed to provide valuable evidence of cancer progression, cancer activity status, response to therapy in patients with metastatic cancer, and possible cancer diagnosis. Recently, a number of researchers reported that CTCs tend to lose their epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) by an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). As such, label-free CTC detection methods are attracting worldwide attention. Here, we describe a label-free DC impedance-based microcytometer for CTCs by exploiting the difference in size between CTCs and blood cells. This system detects changes in DC impedance between two polyelectrolytic gel electrodes (PGEs) under low DC voltages. Using spiked ovarian cancer cell lines (OVCAR-3) in blood as a model system, we were able to count the cells using a microcytometer with 88% efficiency with a flow rate of 13 mu l min(-1) without a dilution process. Furthermore, we examined blood samples from breast cancer patients using the cytometer, and detected CTCs in 24 out of 24 patient samples. Thus, the proposed DC impedance-based microcytometer presents a facile and fast way of CTC evaluation regardless of their biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据