4.7 Article

Uncovering toxicological complexity by multi-dimensional screenings in microsegmented flow: modulation of antibiotic interference by nanoparticles

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 474-484

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1lc20584f

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Environmental Foundation [DBU 20009/009]
  2. BMBF (OPTIMI) [KFZ-16SV3701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The technique of microsegmented flow was applied for the generation of two-and higher dimensional concentration spaces for the screening of toxic effects of selected substances on the bacterium Escherichia coli at the nanolitre scale. Up to about 5000 distinct experiments with different combinations of effector-concentrations could be realized in a single experimental run. This was done with the help of a computer program controlling the flow rates of effector-containing syringe pumps and resulted in the formation of multi-dimensional concentration spaces in segment sequences. Prior to the application of this technique for toxicological studies on E. coli the accuracy of this method was tested by simulation experiments with up to five dissolved dyes with different spectral properties. Photometric microflow-through measurement of dye distribution inside the concentration spaces allowed the monitoring of microfluid segment compositions. Finally, we used this technique for the investigation of interferences of the antibiotics ampicillin and chloramphenicol towards E. coli cultures and their modulation by silver nanoparticles by measuring bacterial autofluorescence. Each concentration point in this three-dimensional concentration space was represented by 4 or 5 single segments. Thus, a high reliability of the measured dose/response relations was achieved. As a result, a complex response pattern was discovered including synergistic and compensatory effects as well as the modulation of the range of stimulation of bacterial growth by a sublethal dose of chloramphenicol by silver nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据