4.7 Article

Microarrays for the scalable production of metabolically relevant tumour spheroids: a tool for modulating chemosensitivity traits

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 419-428

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00089b

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [WE3737/3-1, KU971/7-1]
  2. BMBF
  3. Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research and Technology of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia
  4. International Leibniz Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the use of thin film poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) prints for the arrayed mass production of highly uniform 3-D human HT29 colon carcinoma spheroids. The spheroids have an organotypic density and, as determined by 3-axis imaging, were genuinely spherical. Critically, the array density impacts growth kinetics and can be tuned to produce spheroids ranging in diameter from 200 to 550 mu m. The diffusive limit of competition for media occurred with a pitch of >= 1250 mu m and was used for the optimal array-based culture of large, viable spheroids. During sustained culture mass transfer gradients surrounding and within the spheroids are established, and lead to growth cessation, altered expression patterns and the formation of a central secondary necrosis. These features reflect the microenvironment of avascularised tumours, making the array format well suited for the production of model tumours with defined sizes and thus defined spatio-temporal pathophysiological gradients. Experimental windows, before and after the onset of hypoxia, were identified and used with an enzyme activity-based viability assay to measure the chemosensitivity towards irinotecan. Compared to monolayer cultures, a marked reduction in the drug efficacy towards the different spheroid culture states was observed and attributed to cell cycle arrest, the 3-D character, scale and/or hypoxia factors. In summary, spheroid culture using the array format has great potential to support drug discovery and development, as well as tumour biology research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据