4.7 Article

Matrix density mediates polarization and lumen formation of endothelial sprouts in VEGF gradients

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 10, 期 22, 页码 3061-3068

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c005069e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Academies Keck Futures Initiative CS10 [CS10]
  2. NIH [1DP2 OD006477-01, 1R21 NS058600-01]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS058600] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [DP2OD006477] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelial cell (EC) sprouting morphogenesis is a critical step during angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from existing conduits. Here, three-dimensional sprouting morphogenesis was examined using in vitro microfluidic devices that enabled the separate and simultaneous tuning of biomechanical and soluble biochemical stimuli. Quantitative analysis of endothelial sprout formation demonstrated that the ability of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to regulate stable sprout formation was mediated by the density of the surrounding collagen/fibronectin matrix. The coordinated migration and proliferation of multiple ECs to form stable sprouts were enhanced at intermediate matrix densities (1.2-1.9 mg ml(-1)), while lower densities resulted in uncoordinated migration (0.3-0.7 mg ml(-1)) and higher densities resulted in broad cell clusters that did not elongate (2.7 mg ml(-1)). Within the permissive range of matrix biomechanics, higher density matrices resulted in shorter, thicker, and slower-growing sprouts. The sprouts in higher density matrices also were more likely to polarize towards higher VEGF concentrations, included more cells per cross-sectional area, and demonstrated more stable lumen formation compared to sprouts in lower density matrices. These results quantitatively demonstrate that matrix density mediates VEGF-induced sprout polarization and lumen formation, potentially by regulating the balance between EC migration rate and proliferation rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据