4.7 Article

Integration of semiconductor quantum dots into nano-bio-chip systems for enumeration of CD4+T cell counts at the point-of-need

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 2079-2090

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b817116e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1 U01 DE017793-01]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. Welch Foundation [F-1193]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [U01DE017793] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent humanitarian efforts have led to the widespread release of antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of the more than 33 million HIV afflicted people living in resource-scarce settings. Here, the enumeration of CD4+ T lymphocytes is required to establish the level at which the immune system has been compromised. The gold standard method used in developed countries, based on flow cytometry, though widely accepted and accurate, is precluded from widespread use in resource-scarce settings due to its high expense, high technical requirements, difficulty in operation-maintenance and the lack of portability for these sophisticated laboratory-confined systems. As part of continuing efforts to develop practical diagnostic instrumentation, the integration of semiconductor nanocrystals (quantum dots, QDs) into a portable microfluidic-based lymphocyte capture and detection device is completed. This integrated system is capable of isolating and counting selected lymphocyte sub-populations (CD3+CD4+) from whole blood samples. By combining the unique optical properties of the QDs with the sample handling capabilities and cost effectiveness of novel microfluidic systems, a practical, portable lymphocyte measurement modality that correlates nicely with flow cytometry (R-2 = 0.97) has been developed. This QD-based system reduces the optical requirements significantly relative to molecular fluorophores and the mini-CD4 counting device is projected to be suitable for use in both point-of-need and resource-scarce settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据