4.6 Article

Enhancement of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus versiforme) on the growth and Cd uptake by Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum

期刊

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 44-49

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.01.006

关键词

Cadmium; Solanum nigrum; Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF); Glomus versiforme; Phytoremediation

资金

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China [S2013010012969]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) can enhance plant growth and resistance to toxicity produced by heavy metals (HMs), affect the bioavailability of HMs in soil and the uptake of HMs by plants, and thus has been emerged as the most prominent symbiotic fungus for contribution to phytoremediation. A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of Glomus versiforme BGC GD01C (Gv) on the growth and Cd accumulation of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum in different Cd-added soils (0, 25, 50, 100 mg Cd kg(-1) soil). Mycorrhizal colonization rates were generally high (from 71% to 82%) in Gv-inoculated treatments at all Cd levels. Gv colonization enhanced soil acid phosphatase activity, and hence elevated P acquisition and growth of S. nigrum at all Cd levels. Moreover, the presence of Gv significantly increased DTPA-extractable (phytoavailable) Cd concentrations in 25 and 50 mg Cd kg(-1) soils, but did not affect phytoavailable Cd in 100 mg Cd kg(-1) soil. Similarly, inoculation with Gv significantly increased Cd concentrations of S. nigrum in 25 and 50 mg Cd kg(-1) soils, but decreased Cd concentrations of the plants in 100 mg Cd kg(-1) soil. Overall, inoculation with Gv greatly improved the total Cd uptakes in all plant tissues at all Cd levels. The present results indicated that S. nigrum associated with Gv effectively improved the Cd uptake by plant and would be a new strategy in microbe-assisted phytoremediation for Cd-contaminated soils. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据