4.5 Review

Peripheral vascular endothelial growth factor as a novel depression biomarker: A meta-analysis

期刊

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 18-26

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.07.002

关键词

Depression; Biomarker; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Meta-analysis; Major depressive disorder; Neuronal plasticity

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq
  2. Brazil)
  3. CAPES (Brazil)
  4. MCTI/CNPQ/Universal from CNPq, Brazil [14/2014461833/2014-0]
  5. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [1059660]
  6. CNPq
  7. FAPESC
  8. Instituto Cerebro e Mente
  9. UNESC
  10. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The neurotrophic hypothesis of major depressive disorder (MDD) postulates that the pathology of this illness incorporates a down-regulation of neurotrophin signaling. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is the most studied neurotrophic mediator regarding the neurobiology of MDD. Nevertheless, emerging evidence has implicated the multi-competent angiogenic and neurogenic molecule - vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - in hippocampal neurogenesis and depression pathophysiology. Objective: To compare peripheral levels of VEGF between individuals with MDD and healthy controls. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of original studies measuring peripheral levels of VEGF in participants with MDD compared to healthy controls. We searched the Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycInfo databases for studies published in any language through December 16th, 2014. Results: Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria (N= 1633). VEGF levels were significantly elevated in individuals with MDD when compared to healthy controls (Hedges's g=0.343; 95% Cl: 0.146-0.540; P< 0.01). Funnel plot inspection and the Egger's test did not provide evidence of publication bias. A significant degree of heterogeneity was observed (Q=38.355, df= 13, P< 0.001; I-2= 66.1%), which was explored through meta-regression and subgroup analyses. Overall methodological quality, sample for assay (plasma versus serum), as well as the matching of MDD and control samples for age and gender emerged as significant sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: Taken together, extant data indicate that VEGF shows promise as a biomarker for MDD, and supports that this mediator may be involved in neuroplasticity mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of MDD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据