4.5 Article

DPP4-deficient congenic rats display blunted stress, improved fear extinction and increased central NPY

期刊

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 195-206

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.01.007

关键词

NPY; Anxiety; Stress; Fear; CD26; DPP4

资金

  1. ELAN Fund [ET-11.09.06.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4, CD26) are used for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients and better glucose tolerance has been confirmed in functionally DPP4-deficient congenic rats (DPP4mut), along with immunological alterations and, interestingly, a stress-resilient phenotype. All these findings are in agreement with the moonlighting properties of DPP4, whose proteolytic action is responsible for the inactivation of a number of regulatory peptides including, but not limited to, neuropeptide Y (NPY). Among all candidate substrates, DPP4 displays highest affinity for NPY, an endogenous anxiolytic neurotransmitter that is suggested as a candidate biomarker in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Methods and results: Central and peripheral NPY levels were measured by ELISA in DPP4mut and DAwt rats revealing a significantly higher concentration of the peptide in the CSF of DPP4mut animals. This finding positively correlated with the blunted stress phenotype measured on an analgesia-meter. Additionally, when a classical fear- conditioning paradigm was investigated, short-term fear extinction was significantly potentiated in DPP4mut rats as compared to wt controls. Conclusions: Our findings indicate a positive correlation between reduced stress-responsiveness and increased central NPY, in DPP4mut rats. Most interestingly, the behavioral phenotype extends to facilitation of fear extinction. These observations raise further interest in DPP4-modulating drugs for the potential effect on NPY metabolism, as a therapeutic tool for psychiatric conditions such as anxiety disorders and PTSD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据