4.4 Article

High-temperature CO2 sorption on Na2CO3-impregnated layered double hydroxides

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1668-1673

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-014-0116-1

关键词

Layered Double Hydroxide; Na2CO3; CO2 Sorption; High Temperature

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency and Resources RD program [2011201020004A]
  2. Human Resources Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20134010200600]
  3. Korea CCS R&D Center (KCRC) Grant - Korea government Ministry of Science, ICT & Future planning [2012-0008898]
  4. Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and Technology (KRCF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered double hydroxide (LDH), one of representative high-temperature CO2 sorbents, has many advantages, including stable CO2 sorption, fast sorption kinetics, and low regeneration temperature. However, CO2 sorption uptake on LDH is not high enough for practical use; thus it is usually enhanced by impregnation with alkali metals such as K2CO3. In this study, LDH was impregnated with Na2CO3, and analyses based on scanning electron microscopy, N-2 gas physisorption, in situ X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were carried out to elucidate the characteristics of sorbents and the mechanism of CO2 sorption. Although the surface area of LDH decreased after Na2CO3 impregnation, CO2 sorption uptake was greatly enhanced by the additional basicity of Na2CO3. The crystal structure of Na2CO3 in the Na2CO3-impregnated LDH changed from monoclinic to hexagonal with increasing temperature, and the sorbed-CO2 was stored in the form of carbonate. Thermogravimetric analysis was used to measure CO2 sorption uptake at 200-600 A degrees C. The sample of Na2CO3: LDH=0.35: 1 weight ratio had the largest CO2 sorption uptake among the tested sorbents, and the CO2 sorption uptake tended to increase even after 400 A degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据