4.4 Article

Selective extraction, separation and recovery of Cu(II) in presence of Zn(II) and Ni(II) from leach liquor of waste printed circuit board using microcapsules coated with Cyanex 272

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 668-675

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-011-0220-4

关键词

Copper; Cyanex 272; Factorial Design; Microcapsules; Printed Circuit Board

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia through FRGS
  2. Institute for Post graduate studies (IPS), Universiti Sains Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study was conducted to optimize the selective extraction and recovery of Cu(II) in the presence of Zn(II) and Ni(II) from the leach liquor of waste printed circuit boards (PCBs). The extraction experiments were carried out according to 24 factorial design of experiment to optimize the extraction factors. The design was analyzed using MINITAB to determine the main effects and interactions of the chosen extraction factors. The factors chosen were: extraction pH, amount of Cyanex 272 in dispersed phase during MC-Xs preparation, amount of MC-Xs and temperature. The pH, amount of MC-Xs and temperature were found to be statistically significant. The optimized experimental conditions for the Cu(I) extraction in presence of Zn(11) and Ni(II) were extraction pH 6.0, amount of Cyanex 272 in dispersed phase 3 g, amount of MC-Xs 2.5 g and Temperature 45 degrees C. Factorial design of experiment was also carried out to determine the Cu(II) stripping factors from the loaded MC-Xs using H2SO4 solution. The liquid-liquid extraction Cu(I) was conducted with the prime aim to evaluate the nature of Cu(H) complex extracted by Cyanex 272. Results showed that the extraction species is [Cu(HA(2))(Ac)center dot 2HA]. Finally, a complete process for the separation and recovery of Cu(II), Zn(II) and Ni(II) from the leach liquor of waste PCBs was conducted based on the optimized experimental condition and effect of pH on extraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据