4.7 Article

Sequential three-way classifier with justifiable granularity

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 103-119

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.022

关键词

Sequential three-way decisions; Justifiable granularity; Attribute reduction; Classification; Justifiable attribute subspace

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61876079, 71671086, 61572242, 61503160, 61473157, 61773208, 71732003]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [011814380021]
  3. Central Military Equipment Development of the 13th Five-Year Pre-research Project, China [315050202]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201706190071]
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sequential three-way decisions approach has been demonstrated as an effective methodology of human problem solving with the aid of multiple levels of granularity. Searching an appropriate information granularity for decision or classification is a crucial issue. In this paper, inspired by the principle of justifiable granularity, we investigate a novel classification algorithm, called sequential three-way classifier with justifiable subspace. The major contribution of this study is threefold. First, in training model, with an investigation of the essence of information granularity in rough sets theory, the justifiable attribute subspace is located in an interval with local and global notions. Second, in light of the advantages of attribute reduction technology, the local and global attribute subspaces are determined by core and reduct, respectively. Third, a novel dynamic tri-partition-based predicting strategy is presented with the aid of neighborhood monotonic property. Finally, several experiments are undertaken to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Compared with several state-of-the-art classifiers, the proposed algorithm generally exhibits a better classification performance involving fewer attributes. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据