4.7 Article

Boosting instance selection algorithms

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 342-360

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.04.021

关键词

Instance selection; Boosting; Classifier ensembles; Data mining; Large datasets

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [TIN-2011-22967]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [P09-TIC-4623]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Instance selection is one of the most important preprocessing steps in many machine learning tasks. Due to the increasing size of the problems, removing useless, erroneous or noisy instances is frequently an initial step that is performed before other data mining algorithms are applied. Instance selection as part of this data reduction task is one of the most relevant problems in current data mining research. Over the past decades, many different instance selection algorithms have been proposed, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. However, as in the case of classification, it is unlikely that a single instance selection algorithm would be able to achieve good results across many different datasets and application fields. In classification, one of the most successful ways of consistently improving the performance of a single learner is the construction of ensembles using boosting methods. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for instance selection based on boosting instance selection algorithms in the same way boosting is applied to classification. The proposed approach opens a new field of research in which to apply the many techniques developed for boosting classifiers, for instance selection and other data reduction techniques such as feature selection and simultaneous instance and feature selection. Using 60 datasets for balanced problems and 45 datasets for class-imbalanced problems, the experiments reported show a clear improvement in several state-of-the-art instance selection algorithms using the proposed methodology. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据