4.7 Article

Some programming models to derive priority weights from additive interval fuzzy preference relation

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 69-77

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.12.001

关键词

Fuzzy preference relation; Additive consistent fuzzy preference relation; Additive consistent interval fuzzy preference relation; Linear programming models; Priority weights

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71001075, 70861001, 71020107027]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Major Program of China (863 Program) [2008AA04A107]
  3. 985 project
  4. 211 project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deriving priority weights from fuzzy preference relations is a significant issue in decision making problems. In this paper, based on the definition of additive consistent fuzzy preference relations proposed by Tanino, a new approach with a parameter is developed to obtain priority weights, and properties of the new approach are explored. Then, a method for correcting inconsistent fuzzy preference relations is derived, and a new definition for the additive consistent interval fuzzy preference relations is obtained for the interval complementary pairwise comparison matrix. From these, linear programming models for generating interval priority weights from additive consistent or inconsistent interval fuzzy preference relations are established. Finally, three numerical examples are examined to show the feasibility of the developed method, and comparisons are also made between this new approach and the methods proposed by Xu and Chen [15]. Through the numerical examples, the ranking of interval priority weights using the different methods was found to be the same but with a slightly different degree of possibility. However, for the same interval complementary pairwise comparison matrix, the new definition for additive consistent interval fuzzy preference relations proposed in this paper was found to have more consistent information. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据