4.7 Article

Approximate weighted frequent pattern mining with/without noisy environments

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 73-82

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.07.007

关键词

Data mining; Knowledge discovery; Weighted frequent pattern mining; Weighted support; Approximation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF) [2010-0004197]
  2. Korean Ministry of Education
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6B1621, 2010-0004197, 2009-50376] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In data mining area, weighted frequent pattern mining has been suggested to find important frequent patterns by considering the weights of patterns. More extensions with weight constraints have been proposed such as mining weighted association rules, weighted sequential patterns, weighted closed patterns, frequent patterns with dynamic weights, weighted graphs, and weighted sub-trees or sub structures. In previous approaches of weighted frequent pattern mining, weighted supports of patterns were exactly matched to prune weighted infrequent patterns. However, in the noisy environment, the small change in weights or supports of items affects the result sets seriously. This may make the weighted frequent patterns less useful ill the noisy environment. In this paper, we propose the robust concept of mining approximate weighted frequent patterns. Based on the framework of weight based pattern mining, an approximate factor is defined to relax the requirement for exact equality between weighted supports of patterns and a minimum threshold. After that, we address the concept of mining approximate weighted frequent patterns to find important patterns with/without the noisy data. We analyze characteristics of approximate weighted frequent patterns and run extensive performance tests. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据