4.5 Article

Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1865-6

关键词

Pivot-shift; Acceleration; ACL; Knee kinematics; Navigation system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The pivot-shift phenomenon has been identified to be one of the essential signs of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, the pivot-shift test remains a surgeon-subjective examination, lacking a general recognized quantitative measurement. The goal of the present study was to validate the use of an inertial sensor for quantifying the pivot-shift test, using a commercial navigation system. Methods An expert surgeon intra-operatively performed the pivot-shift test on 15 consecutive patients before ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a commercial navigation system simultaneously acquired limb kinematics. An additional optical tracker mounted on the accelerometer allowed following sensor movements. Anteroposterior (a-p) tibial acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with three-dimensional (3D) acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. The effect of skin artifacts and test-retest positioning were estimated. Repeatability of the acceleration parameter and waveform was analyzed. Correlation between the two measurements was also assessed. Results Average root mean square (RMS) error in test-retest positioning reported a good value of 5.5 +/- 2.9 mm. Mean RMS displacement due to soft tissue artifacts was 4.9 +/- 2.6 mm. The analysis of acceleration range repetitions reported a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Inter-patients similarity analysis showed a mean acceleration waveform correlation of 0.88 +/- 0.14. The acceleration ranges demonstrated a good positive correlation between the two measurements (rs = 0.72, P < 0.05). Conclusion This study showed good reliability of the new device and good correlation with the navigation system results. Therefore, the accelerometer is a valid method to assess dynamic joint laxity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据