4.5 Article

The role of the medial ligamentous structures on patellar tracking during knee flexion

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1598-6

关键词

Medial patellofemoral ligament; Patellar tracking; Patellar tilt; Patellar shift; Patellar rotation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of the medial patellar ligamentous structures on patellar tracking has rarely been studied. Thus the main purpose of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to determine the influence of the medial patellofemoral (MPFL), medial patellomeniscal (MPML) and medial patellotibial (MPTL) ligaments on the three-dimensional patellar tracking during knee flexion. This study was conducted using a validated cadaveric optoelectronic protocol for analysis of patellar kinematics. For each cadaveric knee study, four successive acquisitions were performed; first was studied patellar tracking in healthy knees, then the junction between MPFL and vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) was sectioned, the MPFL was released at its patellar attachment and finally was released the insertion of the MPML and MPTL. In this study, the MPFL accounts for 50-60% of the medial stabilization forces of the lateral patellar shift during patellar engagement in the femoral trochlea. This work confirm and clarify the role of the MPFL as the primary stabilizer of the patella during the initial 30A degrees of knee flexion. Moreover, this study shows no significant results regarding the stabilizing action of the VMO on the patella during knee flexion. This in vitro study, conducted with an experimental protocol previously validated in the literature, helps quantify the actions of the MPFL, the VMO, and the MPML/MPTL respectively, and identify areas of joint motion where these structures have the most significant influence. This confirms the importance of reconstruction in the treatment of chronic patellar instability. During its reconstruction, care should be taken to adjust the MPFL balance during the initial 20A degrees-30A degrees of flexion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据