4.5 Article

Length-change patterns of the collateral ligaments after total knee arthroplasty

期刊

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 1349-1356

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1824-2

关键词

Total knee arthroplasty; Collateral ligaments; Length changes; Femoral component rotation; Biomechanics in vitro

资金

  1. Smith and Nephew (Reconstruction) UK
  2. Arthritis Research (UK)
  3. University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a procedure with function dependent upon correct tensioning of the soft-tissue constraints. The purpose of this study was to examine the length-change behaviour of the collateral ligaments during knee flexion-extension before and after TKA. The influence of differing degrees of internal-external rotation of the femoral component on slackening/tightening of the collateral ligaments during knee flexion was to be studied. The length-change patterns of the collateral ligaments were measured in eight intact knees in vitro: sutures were passed along the ligaments and attached to displacement transducers. Measurements were repeated after TKA with the femoral component in neutral rotation, then with 5A degrees internal and 5A degrees external rotation. Both the MCL and LCL slackened during knee flexion from 0A degrees to 110A degrees flexion, at all stages of the experiment. In the native knee, the MCL slackened 2 mm, whilst the LCL slackened 7 mm. The MCL slackened a further 3 mm and the LCL a further 4 mm during flexion post-TKA. A 5A degrees external rotation of the femoral component slackened the MCL 2 mm more and tightened the LCL by 2 mm. The opposite effects resulted from 5A degrees internal rotation. The collateral ligaments slackened more than normal following TKA, and these length changes were increased by femoral component rotation. External rotation of the femoral component to address patellar tracking may slacken the MCL and thus lead to valgus instability in the flexed knee.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据