4.3 Article

Influence of patient-related factors on clinical outcome of tibial tubercle transfer combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

期刊

KNEE
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1157-1164

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.07.018

关键词

Dislocation; Instability; Maltracking; Osteotomy; Patella; Tubercle

资金

  1. Proresearch Asklepios Clinics Hamburg GmbH [3209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Tibial tubercle transfer is frequently used for treating patellar instability. This study aimed to analyze the clinical results following tibial tuberosity transfer with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in the treatment of patellar instability. Methods: Seventy-two cases presenting a lateralized tibial tubercle were treated with tibial tuberosity transfer and MPFL reconstruction. Pre-operative and postoperative pain levels and knee function were evaluated using common scoring systems. Cartilage status was assessed at the time of surgery, and the influence of patient-related factors was analyzed. Median and interquartile ranges were used to present the results. Results: After a mean of 27.6 (12 -76) months, a re-dislocation rate of 4.2% and significant improvement in knee function from a median of 48.0 (33 -70) to 83.0 (68 -94) and a median of 44.0 (24 -62) to 85.0 (69 -93), based on Kujala (P <= 0.001) and Lysholm (P <= 0.001) scores were observed. The Tegner score significantly increased from a median of 3.0 (2 -4) to 4.0 (4 -5) (P <= 0.001), while the pain level decreased from a median of 5.0 (3 -8) to 2.0 (0 -3) (P <= 0.001). Cartilage lesions were found in 55/72 (76.4%) knees. The likelihood of finding II degrees cartilage lesions was six times higher in cases of >= two previous operations. Conclusion: Tibial tuberosity transfer with MPFL reconstruction allowed reliable patellar stabilization with a low re-dislocation rate. Patient age and unsuccessful attempts at surgical stabilization posed significant risk factors for cartilage lesions and may have limited postopertive outcomes. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据