4.3 Article

Natural distribution of the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle in an osteoarthritic population and its relevance to total knee arthroplasty

期刊

KNEE
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 120-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.02.001

关键词

Total knee arthroplasty; Distal femur; Valgus resection angle; Valgus cut; Femoral mechanical-anatomical angle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A common surgical goal in TKA is to restore neutral alignment of the lower limb by making bone cuts perpendicular to the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia. Standard practice for many surgeons is to use the same distal femoral valgus resection angle for all patients, assuming little or no variation in the femoral mechanical-anatomical (FMA) angle between different patients' knees. This study analysed 174 pre-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs of osteoarthritic knees (157 patients, 87 female and 70 male, mean age 70 years and mean BMI 31.8). Measurements of mechanical femorotibial (MFT) and FMA angles were made. The mean FMA angle was 5.7 degrees (SD 1.2 degrees, range 2 degrees to 9 degrees). There was a statistically significant difference between the FMA angle for males and females with males tending to have larger FMA angles (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between MFT and FMA angle (r = -0.499) with varus knees tending to have larger FMA angles (p<0.001). These results indicate a wide distribution of FMA angle in an osteoarthritic population. In terms of achieving appropriate coronal alignment in TKA the use of a fixed valgus resection angle is not suitable for all patients and it may be preferable to adjust the distal femoral cut according to individual FMA angles. However if this angle is not available the cut may be adjusted according to pre-operative coronal alignment, using 6 degrees for neutral/mild varus, >6 degrees for more severe varus and <6 degrees for valgus knees. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据