4.7 Article

Partitioned Bonferroni mean based on linguistic 2-tuple for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 166-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.017

关键词

Linguistic 2-tuple; Partitioned Bonferronimean; 2-Tuple linguistic partitioned Bonferroni mean; Multi-attribute group decision making

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India [09/1023(007)/2011-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problem is investigated, in which decision makers provide their preferences over alternatives by using linguistic 2-tuple. In the process of decision making, we introduce the idea of a specific structure in the attribute set. We assume that attributes are partitioned into several classes and members of intra-partition are interrelated while no interrelationship exists among inter partition. We emphasize the importance of having an aggregation operator, to capture the expressed inter-relationship structure among the attributes, which we will refer to as partition Bonferroni mean (PBM). We also investigate the behavior of the proposed PBM operator. Further to aggregate the given linguistic information to get overall performance value of each alternative in MAGDM, we analyze PBM operator in linguistic 2-tuple environment and develop three new linguistic aggregation operators: 2-tuple linguistic PBM (2TLPBM), weighted 2-tuple linguistic PBM (W2TLPBM) and linguistic weighted 2-tuple linguistic PBM (LW-2TLPBM). Based on the idea that total linguistic deviation between individual decision maker's opinions and group opinion should be minimized, we develop an approach to determine weight of the decision makers. Finally, a practical example is presented to illustrate the proposed method and comparison analysis demonstrates applicability of the proposed method. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据