3.9 Article

Effectiveness of a Family-oriented Rehabilitation Program on the Quality of Life of Parents of Chronically ill Children

期刊

KLINISCHE PADIATRIE
卷 221, 期 4, 页码 241-246

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1216364

关键词

family-oriented rehabilitation; paediatric chronic conditions; parents; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Parents of chronically ill children face numerous burdens in daily life, which can impair their quality of life (QoL) significantly. Therefore in family-oriented rehabilitation, not only the children themselves, but also their parents receive interventions. These aim at stabilizing parents both mentally and physically to enable them to support their children in the best possible way. This study investigates the effects of an inpatient family-oriented rehabilitation program on the QoL of parents of chronically ill children. Patients: A consecutive sample of 231 mothers and 155 fathers of children suffering from cancer, cardiac diseases or cystic fibrosis participated in the study. Method: In a prospective longitudinal study, parental QoL was repeatedly assessed using the Ulm Quality of Life Inventory for Parents (ULQIE) at three different time points: admission to the rehabilitation clinic, discharge after four weeks of inpatient treatment, and at a six-month follow-up. Results: Parental QoL increased markedly during rehabilitation treatment (mothers eta(2)=.326, fathers eta(2)=.249). Moreover, six months after the intervention, parental quality of life was still markedly improved compared to baseline assessment (mothers eta(2)=.259, fathers eta(2)=.069). The child's diagnosis had no effect on the level and course of parental QoL. Conclusions: Taking part in family-oriented rehabilitation can improve the QoL of parents of children suffering from cancer, cardiac diseases or cystic fibrosis. Such programs could be expected to affect the way chronically ill children cope with their condition and this should be examined in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据