3.9 Article

Hyperferritinemia as the Diagnostic Clue in Life-Threatening Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

期刊

KLINISCHE PADIATRIE
卷 221, 期 5, 页码 318-321

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1104596

关键词

hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; macrophage activation syndrome; ferritin; hyperferritinemia; fever of unknown origin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on a seventeen year old girl with persistent fever of unknown origin. An initial episode of abdominal pain led to laparotomy and appendectomy, which did not reveal any pathological findings. In the course of the next 3 weeks, the girl's general condition progressively deteriorated. Despite extensive diagnostics, no explanation was found. In summary, the girl was cared for by five different departments in two hospitals before she was admitted to our Children's Hospital. We too were initially misguided by the clinical picture of an infectious disease and treated the girl unsuccessfully with antibiotics. The clue in this case was the finding of a markedly elevated level of serum ferritin. While a normal upper value of less than 400 mu g/l is reported, our patient displayed levels above 60000 mu g/l. Such extreme elevations of serum ferritin have been almost exclusively reported for hemophagocytic syndromes, as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). In HLH, impaired cytolytic function of T cells and natural killer cells leads to a state of hyperinflammation. We treated our patient with immunoglobulins and corticosteroids. Simultaneously, we started immunomodulatory therapy with oral cyclosporine A. The clinical response to this treatment was remarkable. The child's general condition stabilized quickly and the fever vanished. Additionally, the recovery was accompanied by a normalization of laboratory findings. In conclusion, HLH is a potentially life-threatening disease, which has to be considered in cases with fever of unknown origin. In our case, the diagnostic clue was an extreme elevation of ferritin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据