4.7 Article

Albumin-induced podocyte injury and protection are associated with regulation of COX-2

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 86, 期 6, 页码 1150-1160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.196

关键词

acute kidney injury; albuminuria; inflammation; podocyte; proteinuria

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [RO1 DK077283]
  2. Nationwide Children's Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Albuminuria is both a hallmark and a risk factor for progressive glomerular disease, and results in increased exposure of podocytes to serum albumin with its associated factors. Here in vivo and in vitro models of serum albumin-overload were used to test the hypothesis that albumin-induced proteinuria and podocyte injury directly correlate with COX-2 induction. Albumin induced COX-2, MCP-1, CXCL1, and the stress protein HSP25 in both rat glomeruli and cultured podocytes, whereas B7-1 and HSP70i were also induced in podocytes. Podocyte exposure to albumin induced both mRNA and protein and enhanced the mRNA stability of COX-2, a key regulator of renal hemodynamics and inflammation, which renders podocytes susceptible to injury. Podocyte exposure to albumin also stimulated several kinases (p38 MAPK, MK2, JNK/SAPK, and ERK1/2), inhibitors of which (except JNK/SAPK) downregulated albumin-induced COX-2. Inhibition of AMPK, PKC, and NF kappa B also downregulated albumin-induced COX-2. Critically, albumin-induced COX-2 was also inhibited by glucocorticoids and thiazolidinediones, both of which directly protect podocytes against injury. Furthermore, specific albumin-associated fatty acids were identified as important contributors to COX-2 induction, podocyte injury, and proteinuria. Thus, COX-2 is associated with podocyte injury during albuminuria, as well as with the known podocyte protection imparted by glucocorticoids and thiazolidinediones. Moreover, COX-2 induction, podocyte damage, and albuminuria appear mediated largely by serum albumin-associated fatty acids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据