4.7 Article

Selective deletion of the endothelial sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor exacerbates kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 85, 期 4, 页码 807-823

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.345

关键词

apoptosis; Cre recombinase; inflammation; necrosis; tamoxifen

资金

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University
  2. [R01 DK-058547]
  3. [R01 GM-067081]
  4. Medical Research Council [G0501711] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0501711] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role for the endothelial sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor (S1P(1)R) in acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear as germline endothelial S1P1R deletion is embryonically lethal. Here, we generated conditional endothelial S1P1R deficiency by crossing mice with floxed S1P1R with mice expressing a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase under the transcriptional control of the platelet-derived growth factor-beta (Pdgf beta) gene. Mice with tamoxifen-induced deletion of endothelial S1P1R had increased renal tubular necrosis, inflammation, and impaired vascular permeability, as well as exacerbated renal tubular apoptosis after ischemic AKI compared with tamoxifen-treated wild-type mice. Moreover, endothelial S1P1R deletion resulted in increased hepatic injury after ischemic AKI. As a potential mechanism for exacerbated renal injury, conditional endothelial S1P1R-null mice had markedly reduced endothelial HSP27 expression compared with wild-type mice. Cultured glomerular endothelial cells treated with a specific S1P1R antagonist (W146) for 3 days also showed reduced HSP27 expression compared with vehicle-treated cells. Finally, mice treated with W146 for 3 days also showed reduced endothelial HSP27 expression as well as exacerbated renal and hepatic injury after ischemic AKI. Thus, our studies demonstrate a protective role for endothelial S1P1R against ischemic AKI most likely by regulating endothelial barrier integrity and endothelial HSP27 expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据