4.7 Article

The erythropoietin receptor is a downstream effector of Klotho-induced cytoprotection

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 468-481

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.149

关键词

cytotoxicity; erythropoietin; erythropoietin receptor; Klotho; NRK cell; oxidative stress

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21-HL096862, R01-DK092461, R01-091392, R01-HL089966]
  2. O'Brien Kidney Research Center [NIH P30DK-07938]
  3. American Heart Foundation Western Affiliate Beginning-Grant-in-Aid [0865235F]
  4. Simmons Family Foundation
  5. Charles and Jane Pak Foundation
  6. Genzyme Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the role of the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor (EpoR) in erythropoiesis has been known for decades, its role in nonhematopoietic tissues is still not well defined. Klotho has been shown and EPo has been suggested to protect against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury in the kidney. Here we found in rat kidney and in a rat renal tubular epithelial cell line (NRK cells) EpoR transcript and antigen, and EpoR activity signified as EPo-induced phosphorylation of Jak2, ErK, Akt, and Stat5 indicating the presence of functional EpoR. Transgenic overexpression of Klotho or addition of exogenous recombinant Klotho increased kidney EpoR protein and transcript. In NRK cells, Klotho increased EpoR protein, enhanced EPo-triggered phosphorylation of Jak2 and Stat5, the nuclear translocation of phospho-Stat5, and protected NRK cells from hydrogen peroxide cytotoxicity. Knockdown of endogenous EpoR rendered NRK cells more vulnerable, and overexpression of EpoR more resistant to peroxide-induced cytotoxicity, indicating that EpoR mitigates oxidative damage. Knockdown of EpoR by siRNA abolished Epo-induced Jak2, and Stat5 phosphorylation, and blunted the protective effect of Klotho against peroxide-induced cytotoxicity. Thus in the kidney, EpoR and its activity are downstream effectors of Klotho enabling it to function as a cytoprotective protein against oxidative injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据