4.7 Review

Novel roles of complement in renal diseases and their therapeutic consequences

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 441-450

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.134

关键词

alternative pathway; C3 glomerulopathy; complement activation; hemolytic uremic syndrome; ischemia-reperfusion injury

资金

  1. JSPS [24591189, 24390213]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24591189, 24390213] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complement system functions as a part of the innate immune system. Inappropriate activation of the complement pathways has a deleterious effect on kidneys. Recent advances in complement research have provided new insights into the pathogenesis of glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury associated with complement activation. A new disease entity termed 'C3 glomerulopathy' has recently been proposed and is characterized by isolated C3 deposition in glomeruli without positive staining for immunoglobulins. Genetic and functional studies have demonstrated that several different mutations and disease variants, as well as the generation of autoantibodies, are potentially associated with its pathogenesis. The data from comprehensive analyses suggest that complement dysregulation can also be associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome and more common glomerular diseases, such as IgA nephropathy and diabetic kidney disease. In addition, animal studies utilizing genetically modified mice have begun to elucidate the molecular pathomechanisms associated with the complement system. From a diagnostic point of view, a noninvasive, MRI-based method for detecting C3 has recently been developed to serve as a novel tool for diagnosing complement-mediated kidney diseases. While novel therapeutic tools related to complement regulation are emerging, studies evaluating the precise roles of the complement system in kidney diseases will still be useful for developing new therapeutic approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据