4.7 Article

Greater variability in kidney function is associated with an increased risk of death

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 82, 期 11, 页码 1208-1214

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2012.276

关键词

acute kidney injury; chronic kidney disease; eGFR slope; longitudinal data; mortality risk; variability

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 15 Career Development Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intra-individual variability in kidney function is a common phenomenon; however, predictors of kidney function variability and its prognostic significance are not known. To examine this question, we assembled a cohort of 51,304 US veterans with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min at the end of the study period and who had at least two eGFR measurements during the previous 3 years. Variability in kidney function was defined for each patient as the coefficient of variation of the regression line fitted to all outpatient measures of eGFR during this time frame. In adjusted analyses, blacks, women, and those with Current Procedural Terminology and ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes for hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, chronic lung disease, hepatitis C, dementia, acute kidney injury, and those with a greater number of hospitalizations had greater variability in eGFR. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, there were 23.66%, 25.68%, and 31.23% deaths among patients in the lowest, intermediate, and highest tertiles of eGFR variability, respectively. Compared with the referent (those in the lowest tertile), patients in the highest tertile had a significantly increased risk of death with a hazard ratio of 1.34 (1.28-1.40), an association consistently present in all sensitivity analyses. Thus, our results demonstrate that greater variability in kidney function is independently associated with increased risk of death. Kidney International (2012) 82, 1208-1214; doi:10.1038/ki.2012.276; published online 1 August 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据