4.7 Article

Detection of glomerular complement C3 fragments by magnetic resonance imaging in murine lupus nephritis

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 152-159

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2011.332

关键词

CR2-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles; glomerulonephritis; T2 relaxation time

资金

  1. Schweppe Foundation
  2. Lupus Research Institute
  3. University of Colorado Cancer Center [NCI P30 CA046934-14]
  4. Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Award [CTSA UL1 RR025780]
  5. Wellcome Trust [WT082291MA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the challenges of treating patients with glomerulonephritis is to accurately assess disease activity. As renal biopsies are routinely stained for deposits of C3 activation fragments and glomerular C3 deposits are found in most forms of glomerulonephritis, we sought to determine whether a relatively noninvasive measure of C3 fragment deposition in the kidney can serve as a good biomarker of disease onset and severity. We recently developed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based method of detecting glomerular C3 and used this to track the progression of renal disease in the MRL/lpr mouse model of lupus nephritis using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated to complement receptor type 2 as a targeting agent. Quantitative immunofluorescence showed that glomerular C3b/iC3b/C3d deposition progressively increased with disease activity, a finding replicated by the T2-weighted MRI. The T2 relaxation times decreased with disease activity in the cortex and medulla of the MRL/lpr but not in MRL/Mpj control mice. Thus, MRI contrast agents targeted to glomerular C3 fragments can be used to noninvasively monitor disease activity in glomerulonephritis. As therapeutic complement inhibitors are used in patients with renal disease, this method, should it become feasible in humans, may identify those likely to benefit from complement inhibition. Kidney International (2012) 81, 152-159; doi:10.1038/ki.2011.332; published online 28 September 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据