4.7 Review

mTOR and rapamycin in the kidney: signaling and therapeutic implications beyond immunosuppression

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 502-511

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.457

关键词

autophagy; cilia; mTOR; PKD; podocyte; VHL

资金

  1. Wyeth
  2. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immunosuppressive drug rapamycin has helped to identify a large signaling network around the target of rapamycin (TOR) protein that integrates information on nutrient availability and growth factors to control protein synthesis and cell size. Studies using rapamycin in animal models of kidney disease indicate that mTOR deregulation has a role in glomerular disease, polycystic kidney disease, and renal cancer. The role of mTOR activation in podocytes is context dependent, and indirect evidence suggests that mTOR may have a role in chronic podocyte loss. Several lines of evidence show that cyst formation in polycystic kidney disease (PKD) involves mTOR activation and its upstream regulator TSC. Polycystin 1 regulates mTOR activity through different pathways, and TSC intersects with the primary cilium, a crucial cell organelle in the pathogenesis of PKD. Data from hamartoma syndromes provide clear evidence that mutation of members of the mTOR network results in renal cancers. The detailed analysis of renal cell carcinomas has revealed a positive feedback loop involving VHL and mTOR. Rapamycin and its derivatives have been approved for the treatment of advanced renal cancer and are being investigated for the treatment of PKD. Discrepancies exist between the effects of rapamycin in animal models and the clinical experience with patients, precluding the widespread use of mTOR inhibitors in kidney disease. The details of mTOR signaling in the kidney need to be clarified to hopefully develop targeted treatments for renal disease in the future. Kidney International (2011) 79, 502-511; doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.457; published online 17 November 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据