4.7 Article

Podocytes require the engagement of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans for adhesion to extracellular matrices

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 78, 期 11, 页码 1088-1099

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.136

关键词

adhesion molecule; cell-matrix interactions; extracellular matrix; glomerular filtration barrier; podocyte

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1-RO1- DK077860-01A1, 3R01DK077860- 02S1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Podocytes adhere to the glomerular basement membrane by cell surface receptors. Since in other cells these adhesions are enhanced by cell surface proteoglycans, we examined the contribution of these molecules and their glycosaminoglycan side chains to podocyte adhesion by developing immortalized podocyte cell lines with (control) or without (mutant) heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycan chains. In adhesion assays control podocytes attached, spread, and migrated more efficiently compared with mutants, indicating a requirement for heparan sulfate chains in these processes. The proteoglycan syndecan-4 is known to have direct effects on cell attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. We found it localized to focal adhesions in control podocytes coincident with stress fiber formation. In mutant cells, syndecan-4 was associated with smaller focal contacts and cortical actin organization. Analysis by flow cytometry showed that mutant cells had twice the amount of surface syndecan-4 of control cells. Protein kinase C alpha, a signaling molecule bound to and activated by syndecan-4, showed a fourfold increase in membrane localization-activation than that seen in control cells. In vivo, the loss of heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans in PEXTKO mice led to a loss of glomerular syndecan-4. Overall, our study provides further evidence for a dynamic role of cell surface heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans in podocyte activity. Kidney International (2010) 78, 1088-1099; doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.136; published online 12 May 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据