4.7 Article

International trends in erythropoietin use and hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 215-223

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.108

关键词

anemia/dt (Drug Therapy); erythropoietin/ad (Administration & Dosage); erythropoietin/ec (Economics); health expenditures/trends; kidney failure; chronic/blood/economics/therapy; reimbursement mechanisms/economics/legislation & jurisprudence

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. Kirin Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemoglobin levels and the dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have risen over time in hemodialysis patients within the United States. There are concerns that these trends may be driven by reimbursement policies that provide potential incentives to increase this use. To determine this we studied trends in the use of ESA and hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients and the relationship of these trends to the mode of reimbursement. Using the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) database of hemodialysis we analyzed facility practices in over 300 randomly selected dialysis units in 12 countries. At each of three phases (years 1996-2001, 2002-2004, and 2005-present), we randomly selected over 7500 prevalent hemodialysis, hemofiltration, or hemodiafiltration patients. ESA usage rose significantly in every country studied except Belgium. All but Sweden demonstrated a substantial increase in hemoglobin levels. In 2005 more than 40% of patients had hemoglobin levels above the KDOQI upper target limit of 120 g/l in all but Japan. These trends appeared to be independent of the manner of reimbursement even though the United States is the only country with significant financial incentives promoting increased use of these agents. Thus, our study found that prescribing higher doses of ESAs and achieving higher hemoglobin levels by physicians reflects a broad trend across DOPPS countries regardless of the reimbursement policies. Kidney International (2010) 78, 215-223; doi:10.1038/ki.2010.108; published online 28 April 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据