4.7 Article

A human ALDH1A2 gene variant is associated with increased newborn kidney size and serum retinoic acid

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 96-102

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.101

关键词

genetics and development; kidney development; kidney volume; pediatric nephrology; vitamin A

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 81313, MOP12954]
  2. Fonds de Recherches en Sante de Quebec
  3. Kidney Foundation of Canada
  4. CIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nephron number varies widely between 0.3 and 1.3 million per kidney in humans. During fetal life, the rate of nephrogenesis is influenced by local retinoic acid (RA) level such that even moderate maternal vitamin A deficiency limits the final nephron number in rodents. Inactivation of genes in the RA pathway causes renal agenesis in mice; however, the impact of retinoids on human kidney development is unknown. To resolve this, we tested for associations between variants of genes involved in RA metabolism (ALDH1A2, CYP26A1, and CYP26B1) and kidney size among normal newborns. Homozygosity for a common (1 in 5) variant, rs7169289(G), within an Sp1 transcription factor motif of the ALDH1A2 gene, showed a significant 22% increase in newborn kidney volume when adjusted for body surface area. Infants bearing this allele had higher umbilical cord blood RA levels compared to those with homozygous wild-type ALDH1A2 rs7169289(A) alleles. Furthermore, the effect of the rs7169289(G) variant was evident in subgroups with or without a previously reported hypomorphic RET 1476(A) proto-oncogene allele that is critical in determining final nephron number. As maternal vitamin A deficiency is widespread in developing countries and may compromise availability of retinol for fetal RA synthesis, our study suggests that the ALDH1A2 rs7169289(G) variant might be protective for such individuals. Kidney International (2010) 78, 96-102; doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.101; published online 14 April 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据