4.7 Article

Regulation of oxygen utilization by angiotensin II in chronic kidney disease

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 197-204

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.481

关键词

NOS-1; remnant kidney; glomerular filtration rate; oxygen consumption; ANG II

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH DK28602, DK56248]
  2. American Heart Association Western States Affiliate
  3. National Kidney Foundation of Southern California
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK056248, R01DK028602, P30DK079337, K08DK084305] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiotensin II blockade delays progression of chronic kidney disease by modifying intrarenal hemodynamics, but the effects on metabolic adaptations are unknown. Using the remnant kidney model of chronic kidney disease in rats, we measured the effects of combined angiotensin II blockade with captopril and losartan on renal oxygen consumption (QO(2)) and factors influencing QO(2). Remnant kidneys had proteinuria and reductions in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal blood flow (RBF) and nitric oxide synthase-1 protein expression while QO(2), factored by sodium reabsorption (QO(2)/TNa), was markedly increased. Combined blockade treatment normalized these parameters while increasing sodium reabsorption but, since QO(2) was unchanged, QO(2)/TNa also normalized. Triple antihypertensive therapy, to control blood pressure, and treatment with lysine, to increase GFR and RBF, did not normalize QO(2)/TNa, suggesting a specific effect of angiotensin II in elevating QO(2)/TNa. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase increased QO2 in the kidney of sham-operated rats but not in the remnant kidney of untreated rats. Our study shows that combined captopril and losartan treatment normalized QO(2)/TNa and functional nitric oxide activity in the remnant kidney independent of blood pressure and GFR effects, suggesting that other mechanisms in addition to hemodynamics underlie the benefits of angiotensin II blockade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据