4.7 Article

Protective effect of 20-HETE analogues in experimental renal ischemia reperfusion injury

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 75, 期 5, 页码 511-517

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.600

关键词

20-HETE; acute kidney injury; acute renal failure; HET0016; ischemia-reperfusion

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL029587-259002, P01 HL029587-250003, P01 HL029587, HL29546, R01 HL036279, HL36279, R37 HL036279-22, R37 HL036279] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK038226, DK38226] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM031278, GM31278] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While it is known that the arachidonic acid metabolite 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE) contributes to ischemic injury in the heart and brain, its role in kidney injury is unclear. Here we determined the effects on ischemia-reperfusion injury of the 20-HETE analogues, 20-hydroxyeicosa-5(Z), 14(Z)-dienoic acid (5,14-20-HEDE), and N-[20-hydroxyeicosa-5(Z), 14(Z)-dienoyl] glycine (5,14-20-HEDGE), and of the inhibitor of 20-HETE synthesis N-hydroxy-N-(4-butyl-2 methylphenyl) formamidine (HET0016). Using Sprague-Dawley rats we found that while treatment with the inhibitor exacerbated renal injury, infusion of both 5,14-20-HEDE and 5,14-20-HEDGE significantly attenuated injury when compared to vehicle or inhibitor-treated rats. Medullary blood flow, measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry, decreased to half of the baseline one hour after reperfusion in the control rats, but 5,14-20-HEDGE completely prevented this. Treatment of control animals with 5,14-20-HEDGE increased urine output and sodium excretion without altering their mean arterial pressure or glomerular filtration rate. Our results suggest that 20-HETE analogues protect the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting renal tubular sodium transport and preventing the post-ischemic fall in medullary blood flow. Analogues of 20-HETE may be useful in the treatment of acute ischemic kidney injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据