4.7 Article

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and the renal hemodynamic response to L-arginine

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 327-332

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.574

关键词

functional gene polymorphism; endothelial nitric oxide synthase; nitric oxide; renal hemodynamic function; effective renal plasma flow; glomerular filtration rate

资金

  1. Kidney Foundation of Canada
  2. CIHR/AMGEN Canada Kidney Research Chair at the University Health Network, University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide is generated from L-arginine by nitric oxide synthase (NOS), an enzyme that exists in several isoforms. Some studies found that a polymorphism (G894T) in the endothelial NOS gene was associated with decreased nitric oxide bioactivity and vascular complications. However, it is not known whether the enzyme had a reduced activity. Here we measured the effect of an infusion of L-arginine on renal hemodynamic function in subjects segregated by the presence or absence of the T allele. If this polymorphism represented a functional variant, subjects with the GT/TT form should exhibit a blunted renal hemodynamic response to L-arginine compared to those with a GG allele. All subjects were given a diet controlled for sodium and protein intake. GG subjects had lower mean arterial pressure and an augmented glomerular filtration rate at baseline. In response to a graded L-arginine infusion, this group had significant changes in effective renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, filtration fraction, renal vascular resistance, and renal blood flow. The renal response to L-arginine in GT/TT subjects was blunted. Circulating cGMP levels and endothelial NOS mRNA expression, measured in skin biopsies by real-time PCR, did not differ between the groups. Our study shows that the G894T allele of endothelial NOS is associated with a blunted response to L-arginine, suggesting this polymorphism may be a functional variant in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据